Monthly Archives: November 2009

De minimis regulation, State aid, private companies…

Every private company involved in joining EU programmes (projects implementation consortia) will sooner or later certainly have to deal with the so-called de minimis regulation. In a few words, the money you get as a consortia member are supposed to be sort of state aid which will eventualy lead to distortive effects on competition. EU Public Authorities are allowed to grant economic aid to private companies only within a fixed treshold expressly authorized by the European Commission.  If an SME is involved into a project developed under a EU cofinanced program, and would like to have its activity rewarded, it has to deal with state aid legal framework.

In order to facilitate SME’s participation an exception has been added anyway: there is a class of aid for which notification from EU member states to European Commission is not needed; these are aid of minor importance, as defined by the EU de minimis, which are not presumed to affect competition significantly.

Here is a short summary if you’d rather be working than having a Master’s Degree on euro-intricacy:

  • EC Regulation no. 1998/2006 was meant to simplify the operational/legal framework on state-aid. It stated that, below a certain threshold, an aid could be granted to enterprises without the need for the provider to notify it to the European Commission (notification otherwise required). The threshold of aid has then been set to € 200.000 (€ 100.000 for road transport activities) over a period of three fiscal years (present financial year and the two previous ones). Now Public authorities can then grant aid to businesses of any size, under the de minimis rule, without notice.

Hint: aid of no more than € 200.000 granted over a period of three years is not regarded as State aid. read more »

Why a QR Code is better than a RFID tag.

Yesterday i was in Milan. It’s been a very interesting day. In my EU-funding-programs-guanxi-development i was in search for cultural heritage contents and tech applications definition and design. First of all i met prof.ssa Silvia Lusuardi Siena, Director of Archeology Dept. of Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore. We discussed about Superintendence for Architectural Heritage and Landscape policies, Paleochristian heritage, EU funds and more…

Then, talking with Paolo Magni and Fabrizio Amarilli of Fondazione Politecnico di Milano we started exploring opportunities in Cultural Heritage enhancement by means of technologies as Augmented Reality and QR Codes. We found that a QR Code is better than a RFID TAG mainly because…

  • it’s cheaper
  • you won’t need any tag rewriting if the database of Point of Interest and catalogued assets will ever change
  • you will have to deal with a low criticality if the tag is removed or damaged
  • you won’t need an ad hoc device to read it (i.e. NFC device, you can simply use your smartphone)

read more »